Is this how Harrison Smith wants to be remembered when he goes on to the next world after his dealth in this psysical world ? BSD ' What is with Harrison Smith calling out Amalek as todays show ends that Harrison Smith hosts ? Harrison Smith hosted The American Journal on Infowars' platform (banned.video) for several years, typically airing weekday mornings. Following Owen Shroyer's departure from Infowars in September 2025, Smith took over as host of The War Room (weekdays 3-6 PM CT). Recent episodes on banned.video (including airings around early 2026) align with this hosting history, though the site's homepage does not always explicitly name hosts in listings.
Accusations of Antisemitism
Harrison Smith has faced persistent accusations of antisemitism from critics, watchdog groups, podcasts, and media reports dating back to at least 2022. These include:
Descriptions of him as one of the most openly antisemitic on-air personalities at Infowars
Instances of engaging with or failing to strongly challenge antisemitic callers
Promoting conspiracy theories that echo antisemitic tropes (e.g., undue influence by Israel or Jewish figures in global events)
BSD ' BANNED.VIDEO sourcesplay 223:19 - 2:37:28 - FULL SHOW - 06/17/2025 requested (from 2:23:19 to 2:37:28, about 14 minutes towards the end of the full broadcast, which is about 2:37-2:40 hours long) deals with a theological-political debate - LET US TALK ABOUT ISLAM AND YISHMAEL NOW ! I MENTIONED IT ON YOUR SHOW AND NOW WORLDWIDE IS TALKING ABOUT SUBJECT THAT i SUGGESTED TO HARRISON SMITH ON AMERICAN JOURNAL OVER A YEAR AGO - HARRISON DIDN’T WANT TO TALK ABOUT IT THEN BUT NOW IT IS OK. ?
‘ BSD ' sourcesplay 223:19 - 2:37:28 - https://www.banned.video/watch? id=6851a86c4e1f496b21a338bcThe section you requested (from 2:23:19 to 2:37:28, about 14 minutes towards the end of the full broadcast, which is about 2:37-2:40 hours long) deals with a theological-political debate about divine promises to Israel in the Land of Canaan, in the context of the controversy in the MAGA and evangelical camps regarding Trump's policy vis-à-vis the Iran-Israel conflict (which is one of the central themes of the entire episode).
From the available information (including viewer comments directly on the video page), it appears that host Harrison Smith was discussing a previous phone call there with a caller named Tuvia (probably a Jew or someone knowledgeable in the Bible), who was making arguments from the Bible against the common Zionist-evangelical interpretation.
I can provide a detailed summary of the content, including the key biblical quotes and arguments raised.
General background to the episode:
The final segment (your segment) is a theological discussion on the biblical promises to Abraham and Israel, in a political context – is supporting modern Israel a religious obligation (as many evangelicals claim), or is it a misinterpretation?
The entire episode (2:37:28 hours) deals with
Summary of the segment (based on viewer responses, related mainly with the division in the MAGA camp (Trump supporters) regarding policy towards the Iran-Israel war.
The final segment (your segment) is a theological discussion on the biblical promises to Abraham and Israel, in a political context – is supporting modern Israel a religious obligation (as many evangelicals claim), or is it a misinterpretation?
Summary of the segment (based on viewer responses, related descriptions and searches):
The segment begins around 2:23:19, towards the end of the broadcast, when Harrison Smith receives a phone call from Tuvia. Tuvia argues against the common Zionist-evangelical interpretation, citing verses from Genesis 12 to prove that the promises are spiritual and not necessarily political/geographical to the modern state of Israel. Harrison responds, but the debate remains open and unresolved – Tuvia seeks to continue it in a structured discussion.
Key points from the discussion (paraphrased based on Tuvia’s response on the website and similar discussions):
The key biblical quote (Genesis 12:1-3,7):
Tuvia quotes the verses in Hebrew and English to emphasize that the promise is to Abraham personally, and not necessarily to his physical descendants or a modern state:
“And the Lord said to Abram, ‘Go from your country and from your kindred and from your father’s house to the land that I will show you.’” (v. 1)
"And I will bless them that bless thee, and he that curseth thee I will shine: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed." (v. 3)
"And the LORD feared Abram, and said, Unto thy seed will I give this land: and he built there an altar unto the LORD that appeared unto him." (v. 7)
Tuvia's argument: The promise is to the "seed" of Abraham, but it does not necessarily refer to modern Jews or to the State of Israel of 1948. It can be spiritual (as in the Christian interpretation of Paul in Galatians 3: "And if ye be Christ's, then are ye seed Abraham and heirs according to the assurance"). He argues that unqualified support for Israel is a "hypnotism" that must be shaken off.
Harrison Smith's response:
Harrison defends the evangelical interpretation: descriptions and searches):
The segment begins around 2:23:19, towards the end of the broadcast, when Harrison Smith receives a phone call from Tuvia. Tuvia argues against the common Zionist-evangelical interpretation, citing verses from Genesis 12 to prove that the promises are spiritual and not necessarily political/geographical to the modern state of Israel. Harrison responds, but the debate remains open and unresolved – Tuvia seeks to continue it in a structured discussion.
Key points from the discussion (paraphrased based on Tuvia’s response on the website and similar discussions):
The key biblical quote (Genesis 12:1-3,7):
Tuvia quotes the verses in Hebrew and English to emphasize that the promise is to Abraham personally, and not necessarily to his physical descendants or a modern state:
“And the Lord said to Abram, ‘Go from your country and from your kindred and from your father’s house to the land that I will show you.’” (v. 1)
"And I will bless them that bless thee, and he that curseth thee I will shine: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed." (v. 3)
"And the LORD feared Abram, and said, Unto thy seed will I give this land: and he built there an altar unto the LORD that appeared unto him." (v. 7)
Tuvia's argument: The promise is to the "seed" of Abraham, but it does not necessarily refer to modern Jews or to the State of Israel of 1948. It can be spiritual
The main points in this discussion (based on direct reference to the passage):
A quote from Parashah Lech Lech (Genesis 12): "Go from your land... to the land that I will show you" – and the promise of blessing and cursing: "And I will bless those who bless you, and those who curse you, I will bless you."
Claim that the promises are related to the "seed of Abraham" in a specific spiritual/biblical context, and not necessarily to the modern state or all its supporters.
The debate remains unresolved, and caller Tuvia suggests continuing it or holding a formal debate, addressing unanswered questions from the previous time (perhaps from an earlier broadcast).
This ties into the episode's broader theme: the division in the Trump camp between "America First" supporters who oppose military involvement on behalf of Israel, and evangelicals who see unqualified support for Israel as a religious obligation (due to interpretations such as Romans 11 on Israel's "temporary blindness").
There is no full transcript or official subtitles available for this segment (Infowars does not usually provide such), but it seems like a closing broadcast with a deeper discussion of theological issues related to the current politics of that day (June 2025).
If you watched the segment and there is a specific point that interests you (a particular argument, quote, or broader context) – let me know and I will help analyze it in depth, including biblical sources or opposing views! 😊4.1s12 sourcesplay 223:19 - 2:37:28 - https://www.banned.video/watch? id=6851a86c4e1f496b21a338bcThe specific segment you requested (from 2:23:19 to 2:37:28) is a phone call between host Harrison Smith and caller Tuvia
BSD ' MERRY CHRISTMAS INFOWARRIORS. HARRISON SMITH @ WWW.INFOWARS.COM/SHOW ' YOU DIDN'T WANT TO TALK ABOUT YISHMAEL IN OUR LAST CONVERSATION ON MY CALL APPROXIMATELY A YEAR AGO TO THE AMERICAN JOURNAL, WHICH I SENT YOU. HOWEVER, YOU HAVE COMMUNICATED ABOUT ISLAM FOR THE LAST YEAR. THERE IS A CONNECTION BETWEEN ISLAM AND YISHMAEL. IF YOU UNDERSTAND THE ROOTS OF ISHMAEL, YOU WILL START TO UNDERSTAND ISLAM. THIS YOU WILL TALK ABOUT FOR THE NEXT YEAR. DON'T FIGHT THE RIGHT TO RESEARCH AND UNDERSTAND YISHMAEL. IF YOU UNDERSTAND ESAV AND JACOB IT WILL BE EASIER FOR YOU TOO. MERRY CHRISTMAS FROM A SHEPHERD IN HEBRON - SUSSIYA TO YOU AND YOUR WIFE AND YOUR FAMILY. MERRY CHRISTMAS - https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/419863
BSD ' please air now !!
We have no freedom until we can talk in front of city hall or Dundas square ! https://www.rebelnews.com/toronto_police_takeover_yonge_dundas_square_arrest_protesters_try_to_shut_down_media_coverage
BSD ' Why They Turned Against the Jews - Rabbi Tovia Singer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPEnrdWHjgM
? Your thoughts on the question ? BSD Please play que it up ? ' Call. 223:19 - 2:37:28 - https://www.banned.video/watch?id=6851a86c4e1f496b21a338bc - let us have a conversation on your thoughts to my question ?
This is my call. Can you air the following on the War Room now ? ב״ה ' red heifer ?https://rumble.com/v4pvwr2-red-heifer-debate-w-adam-king-and-byron-stinson-vs-pastor-shelley-and-jimen.html https://rumble.com/v4k231c-how-four-red-heifers-started-the-war-in-gaza.html The unlikely role red cows play in war between Israel and Hamas https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8Co3C7gXWGA&pp=ygUeUmVkIGhlaWZlciBzdGFydGVkIHdhciBpbiBnYXph Hamas ADMITS the Red Heifer is Their Cause of War https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fnpg6ZNTGAc&pp=ygUThttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIHkF0MwEVAhttps://www.youtube.com/shorts/MK4rN4pAJCwhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLTDsx0C_hohttps://www.youtube.com/shorts/ekTyVRGnUCkhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vr7Izld8DYQContext of the ClaimYes, a senior Hamas spokesman explicitly cited the arrival of red heifers in Israel as one of the key motives for the group's October 7, 2023, attack on Israel, which sparked the ongoing Gaza war. This was stated publicly on January 14, 2024—marking the 100th day of the conflict—by Abu Obeida (also spelled Abu Ubaydah or Abu Obeida), the masked military spokesman for Hamas's Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades (its armed wing). In a pre-recorded video speech broadcast on Al Jazeera and other outlets, he framed the assault (codenamed "Al-Aqsa Flood") as a defensive response to perceived Israeli religious aggressions, including the "bringing of red cows" to Jerusalem. He described this as part of a broader "detestable religious myth"
BSD ' can you air the following on the war room. Thanks in advance, Tuvia
https://rumble.com/v4k231c-how-four-red-heifers-started-the-war-in-gaza.html
BSD ' https://grok.com/c/2f8137c9-9e22-43a5-acf0-faf15f9d0488?rid=799415e2-9104-4907-b029-b90326a926b8
*please talk about following with Syria Girl and ask opinion ? ? This is my call ? BSD ' please air with Alex Jones now
ב״ה ' red heifer ?
https://rumble.com/v4pvwr2-red-heifer-debate-w-adam-king-and-byron-stinson-vs-pastor-shelley-and-jimen.html https://rumble.com/v4k231c-how-four-red-heifers-started-the-war-in-gaza.html https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8Co3C7gXWGA&pp=ygUeUmVkIGhlaWZlciBzdGFydGVkIHdhciBpbiBnYXph
https://x.com/ShabbosK
https://x.com/HarrisonHSmith
https://x.com/RabbiShmuley
https://x.com/RealAlexJones
https://x.com/AJNlive
? LET MY PEOPLE GO HARRISON SMITH. TALK ABOUT THE RED HEIFFER ? FREE SPEECH ? LET ME TAK ABOUT THE RED COW NOW ?
-let us have a debate syria girl on spaces ? BSD ' Let MY People Go - https://tuvia.substack.com/p/let-my-people-go
can you air on your show ' This is my call. BSD ' Let My People Go - Exodus: Liberation for Divine Service - https://grok.com/c/177d5540-fdcb-44ff-be62-318325a20235?rid=b457f67f-0c9e-49cc-9bb1-32594344cb6e - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vr7Izld8DYQ
BSD ' https://x.com/Chabad/status/2008924085657665687?s=20
How much do you know about Maimonides?Take the quiz here:
Is this how Harrison Smith wants to be remembered when he goes on to the next world after his dealth in this psysical world ? BSD ' What is with Harrison Smith calling out Amalek as todays show ends that Harrison Smith hosts ? Harrison Smith hosted The American Journal on Infowars' platform (banned.video) for several years, typically airing weekday mornings. Following Owen Shroyer's departure from Infowars in September 2025, Smith took over as host of The War Room (weekdays 3-6 PM CT). Recent episodes on banned.video (including airings around early 2026) align with this hosting history, though the site's homepage does not always explicitly name hosts in listings.
Accusations of Antisemitism
Harrison Smith has faced persistent accusations of antisemitism from critics, watchdog groups, podcasts, and media reports dating back to at least 2022. These include:
Descriptions of him as one of the most openly antisemitic on-air personalities at Infowars
Instances of engaging with or failing to strongly challenge antisemitic callers
Promoting conspiracy theories that echo antisemitic tropes (e.g., undue influence by Israel or Jewish figures in global events)
BSD ' PLEASE GIVE THIS TO ALEX JONES @ WWW.INFOWARS.COM/SHOW ' TO AIR ? https://grok.com/c/2f8137c9-9e22-43a5-acf0-faf15f9d0488?rid=a4948499-a37e-402c-bd66-fcc7fe05dab2
‘ BSD ' https://grok.com/c/2d24623c-bd89-4058-aba6-5f354aaab64f?rid=e48693b9-8ec5-47b9-9332-7cbe86b2b5bb
BSD ' BANNED.VIDEO sourcesplay 223:19 - 2:37:28 - FULL SHOW - 06/17/2025 requested (from 2:23:19 to 2:37:28, about 14 minutes towards the end of the full broadcast, which is about 2:37-2:40 hours long) deals with a theological-political debate - LET US TALK ABOUT ISLAM AND YISHMAEL NOW ! I MENTIONED IT ON YOUR SHOW AND NOW WORLDWIDE IS TALKING ABOUT SUBJECT THAT i SUGGESTED TO HARRISON SMITH ON AMERICAN JOURNAL OVER A YEAR AGO - HARRISON DIDN’T WANT TO TALK ABOUT IT THEN BUT NOW IT IS OK. ?
‘ BSD ' sourcesplay 223:19 - 2:37:28 - https://www.banned.video/watch? id=6851a86c4e1f496b21a338bcThe section you requested (from 2:23:19 to 2:37:28, about 14 minutes towards the end of the full broadcast, which is about 2:37-2:40 hours long) deals with a theological-political debate about divine promises to Israel in the Land of Canaan, in the context of the controversy in the MAGA and evangelical camps regarding Trump's policy vis-à-vis the Iran-Israel conflict (which is one of the central themes of the entire episode).
From the available information (including viewer comments directly on the video page), it appears that host Harrison Smith was discussing a previous phone call there with a caller named Tuvia (probably a Jew or someone knowledgeable in the Bible), who was making arguments from the Bible against the common Zionist-evangelical interpretation.
I can provide a detailed summary of the content, including the key biblical quotes and arguments raised.
General background to the episode:
The final segment (your segment) is a theological discussion on the biblical promises to Abraham and Israel, in a political context – is supporting modern Israel a religious obligation (as many evangelicals claim), or is it a misinterpretation?
The entire episode (2:37:28 hours) deals with
Summary of the segment (based on viewer responses, related mainly with the division in the MAGA camp (Trump supporters) regarding policy towards the Iran-Israel war.
The final segment (your segment) is a theological discussion on the biblical promises to Abraham and Israel, in a political context – is supporting modern Israel a religious obligation (as many evangelicals claim), or is it a misinterpretation?
Summary of the segment (based on viewer responses, related descriptions and searches):
The segment begins around 2:23:19, towards the end of the broadcast, when Harrison Smith receives a phone call from Tuvia. Tuvia argues against the common Zionist-evangelical interpretation, citing verses from Genesis 12 to prove that the promises are spiritual and not necessarily political/geographical to the modern state of Israel. Harrison responds, but the debate remains open and unresolved – Tuvia seeks to continue it in a structured discussion.
Key points from the discussion (paraphrased based on Tuvia’s response on the website and similar discussions):
The key biblical quote (Genesis 12:1-3,7):
Tuvia quotes the verses in Hebrew and English to emphasize that the promise is to Abraham personally, and not necessarily to his physical descendants or a modern state:
“And the Lord said to Abram, ‘Go from your country and from your kindred and from your father’s house to the land that I will show you.’” (v. 1)
"And I will bless them that bless thee, and he that curseth thee I will shine: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed." (v. 3)
"And the LORD feared Abram, and said, Unto thy seed will I give this land: and he built there an altar unto the LORD that appeared unto him." (v. 7)
Tuvia's argument: The promise is to the "seed" of Abraham, but it does not necessarily refer to modern Jews or to the State of Israel of 1948. It can be spiritual (as in the Christian interpretation of Paul in Galatians 3: "And if ye be Christ's, then are ye seed Abraham and heirs according to the assurance"). He argues that unqualified support for Israel is a "hypnotism" that must be shaken off.
Harrison Smith's response:
Harrison defends the evangelical interpretation: descriptions and searches):
The segment begins around 2:23:19, towards the end of the broadcast, when Harrison Smith receives a phone call from Tuvia. Tuvia argues against the common Zionist-evangelical interpretation, citing verses from Genesis 12 to prove that the promises are spiritual and not necessarily political/geographical to the modern state of Israel. Harrison responds, but the debate remains open and unresolved – Tuvia seeks to continue it in a structured discussion.
Key points from the discussion (paraphrased based on Tuvia’s response on the website and similar discussions):
The key biblical quote (Genesis 12:1-3,7):
Tuvia quotes the verses in Hebrew and English to emphasize that the promise is to Abraham personally, and not necessarily to his physical descendants or a modern state:
“And the Lord said to Abram, ‘Go from your country and from your kindred and from your father’s house to the land that I will show you.’” (v. 1)
"And I will bless them that bless thee, and he that curseth thee I will shine: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed." (v. 3)
"And the LORD feared Abram, and said, Unto thy seed will I give this land: and he built there an altar unto the LORD that appeared unto him." (v. 7)
Tuvia's argument: The promise is to the "seed" of Abraham, but it does not necessarily refer to modern Jews or to the State of Israel of 1948. It can be spiritual
The main points in this discussion (based on direct reference to the passage):
A quote from Parashah Lech Lech (Genesis 12): "Go from your land... to the land that I will show you" – and the promise of blessing and cursing: "And I will bless those who bless you, and those who curse you, I will bless you."
Claim that the promises are related to the "seed of Abraham" in a specific spiritual/biblical context, and not necessarily to the modern state or all its supporters.
The debate remains unresolved, and caller Tuvia suggests continuing it or holding a formal debate, addressing unanswered questions from the previous time (perhaps from an earlier broadcast).
This ties into the episode's broader theme: the division in the Trump camp between "America First" supporters who oppose military involvement on behalf of Israel, and evangelicals who see unqualified support for Israel as a religious obligation (due to interpretations such as Romans 11 on Israel's "temporary blindness").
There is no full transcript or official subtitles available for this segment (Infowars does not usually provide such), but it seems like a closing broadcast with a deeper discussion of theological issues related to the current politics of that day (June 2025).
If you watched the segment and there is a specific point that interests you (a particular argument, quote, or broader context) – let me know and I will help analyze it in depth, including biblical sources or opposing views! 😊4.1s12 sourcesplay 223:19 - 2:37:28 - https://www.banned.video/watch? id=6851a86c4e1f496b21a338bcThe specific segment you requested (from 2:23:19 to 2:37:28) is a phone call between host Harrison Smith and caller Tuvia
BSD ' MERRY CHRISTMAS INFOWARRIORS. HARRISON SMITH @ WWW.INFOWARS.COM/SHOW ' YOU DIDN'T WANT TO TALK ABOUT YISHMAEL IN OUR LAST CONVERSATION ON MY CALL APPROXIMATELY A YEAR AGO TO THE AMERICAN JOURNAL, WHICH I SENT YOU. HOWEVER, YOU HAVE COMMUNICATED ABOUT ISLAM FOR THE LAST YEAR. THERE IS A CONNECTION BETWEEN ISLAM AND YISHMAEL. IF YOU UNDERSTAND THE ROOTS OF ISHMAEL, YOU WILL START TO UNDERSTAND ISLAM. THIS YOU WILL TALK ABOUT FOR THE NEXT YEAR. DON'T FIGHT THE RIGHT TO RESEARCH AND UNDERSTAND YISHMAEL. IF YOU UNDERSTAND ESAV AND JACOB IT WILL BE EASIER FOR YOU TOO. MERRY CHRISTMAS FROM A SHEPHERD IN HEBRON - SUSSIYA TO YOU AND YOUR WIFE AND YOUR FAMILY. MERRY CHRISTMAS - https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/419863